🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous online content suggests that a simple age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from the West, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this global debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.