🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, the former US president seemed to embrace a firm position on the Ukrainian conflict. After delivering threats of "serious repercussions" in August if Russia's president persisted blocking peace discussions, he ultimately introduced major penalties on the Russian primary petroleum corporations, these major energy companies. This move significantly hindered the Russian leader's capacity to finance his military invasion in the region.

But, with his recently unveiled 28-point peace plan for Ukraine, reportedly drafted by American and Russian representatives excluding Ukrainian or EU involvement, Trump has apparently reverted to his pro-Putin position.

Benefiting Invasion

The former president's plan would effectively benefit the Russian leader for invading Ukraine while placing the country's democracy in danger. Despite ringing declarations that "Ukraine's sovereignty will be confirmed", significant aspects of the proposal actually undermine that same autonomy. What represents a Russian ideal would certainly be a catastrophe for the nation.

Reflecting his corporate experience, Trump seems to treat the situation in Ukraine as a basic territorial dispute, like giving Russia a portion of Ukraine's territory will please the president. However, Russia's war is not merely about occupying a destroyed area of industrial-devastated area in the Donbas region. Instead, it's about the nation's democracy – and the Russian leader's obvious intention to destroy it so it no longer functions as an enticing example for the Russia's population of the democratic government that his increasing dictatorship withholds them.

Border Surrenders

Although maintaining in position the already separated oblasts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's initiative would require the nation to surrender the entire Donetsk region. Aside from benefiting Russia with territory that its forces have been failed to capture in exceeding a lengthy period of fighting, this surrender would make Ukrainian military defenses dangerously undermined.

The area is the location of Ukraine's much-vaunted "fortress belt", the well-established military defenses that represent a critical impediment to Russian advances. The proposal would have the Ukrainian military surrender these defenses, leaving Russian forces a unobstructed route to the capital should he later decide to resume the hostilities.

Defense Restrictions

Additionally, in a action that would make additional conflict simpler for the Russian military, the plan would mandate Ukraine to cut the scale of its armed forces from their existing large number personnel to a cap of this lower number. Importantly, the plan imposes no similar constraints on Russian forces.

Apparently as a concession to Russia's efforts to depict Ukraine's democratically elected leadership as Nazis, the proposal asserts: "Any extremist belief system and activities must be condemned and prohibited." Apparently to highlight this aspect, it requires that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in this period" of a truce. However, the proposal sets no obligation that the Russian leader endanger his dictatorship by allowing elections in his own country.

Protection Guarantees

To be sure, the initiative includes Russia promise not to "enter bordering nations" and to "establish in legislation its stance of non-aggression towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". But given that Putin has broken equivalent accords in the history – for example the 1994 agreement, in which the Russian government promised to respect Ukraine's territorial integrity in return for surrendering its former Soviet nuclear weapons, and the Minsk accords, in which Russia promised to a truce and a handback of captured land in the region to the government – why should anyone believe Russia now?

That is why the Ukrainian government has been so insistent on western security guarantees. Although the proposal promises a "strong unified military response" should Russia restart its aggression, and includes that "The nation will receive dependable protection assurances", the particulars include unclear to alarming. The initiative would not just block the nation alliance membership but also preclude alliance nations from stationing troops on the nation's land, thereby blocking the reassurance force, reportedly led by Britain and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been counting to prevent Putin from rebuilding his reduced troops, re-equipping, and resuming aggression.

Global Reaction

An additional parallel deal reportedly would provide Ukraine with a Nato-style security guarantee, in which any later "serious, deliberate, and sustained aggression" by Russia on Ukraine "would be considered as an attack threatening the peace and security of the allied countries." This implies a military response. Yet in contrast to a capable Ukraine's armed forces – Ukraine's primary defense against additional invasion – the effectiveness of the side agreement would depend on the commitment of Western powers, such as the US administration, to react through arms to Russia's aggression, something they have {not