An Enduring Peace Among the Israeli State and Palestine? We have Witnessed Similar Promises – The Outcome Was Increased Bloodshed
So, what year do we find ourselves? A US president, following an extended period of implicit backing, has at last become involved to halt an offensive by Israeli forces that has reduced large areas of a urban center in the region to rubble, resulting in thousands killed and generating worldwide anger.
The campaign has been preceded by a succession of assaults on Israel. Presently, under pressure from the White House, the prime minister of Israel, a conservative politician with an aptitude for popular speech and an intense sense of historical Jewish national duty, has approved a halt in hostilities.
Historical Comparisons
The time period is not the current year, but four decades ago. The location is not Gaza City, but Beirut, Lebanon. The US leader is President Reagan, not the current administration.
There are numerous variations between what happened in Lebanon more than four decades ago and recent developments in Gaza in the last 24 months. The October attack of last year, which caused 1,200 and saw numerous captured, bears little comparison with the comparatively limited actions of the Palestinian leadership in the time before Israel's invasion of Lebanon.
Remarkable Resemblances
Certain parallels are striking. Reagan finally contacted the Israeli leader, informing him that what was happening in the city was "a catastrophe" and indicating the relations between their nations could be gravely damaged if the fighting continued.
At that time, much as today, the war developed in immediate coverage on televisions worldwide. Numerous correspondents flew into the city to cover for the premier occasion an regional battle without information control by either side.
Results and Outcomes
The situation after the call from American leadership and the halt in fighting in Beirut is educational. The liberation movement, its divisions and leaders were spread across multiple countries and a multiple nations.
American leadership then pulled out international forces – an infringement of the arrangement with PLO leadership. The elected leader, Lebanon's recently chosen president and Israeli-supported figure, was murdered by Damascus operatives.
Middle Eastern Changes
The same was true across the broader area. By the end of the 1970s, the predominantly worldly and progressive ideas that had seemed to offer the hope of a different tomorrow in the regional countries a decade or so earlier were discredited.
The outcomes of this became very clear, almost immediately
Throughout the area, Israel and the United States now encountered opponents who were considerably more intractable, lethal and effective than the leftists and independence advocates of previous times.
Global Approach
Among Western nations, the consequences of this were unexpected. During the 1970s, global observers and government representatives had sought to understand what generated armed fundamentalism.
Afterward, in the early 1980s, this ended. National figures in the America, the Britain and additional countries were no longer interested in "fundamental sources" of violence.
Modern Parallels
In recent days, sources suggest that present administration informed Israeli counterparts that Israel could not oppose international consensus and acknowledged territorial ambitions for a sovereign entity.
Similarly was an parallel of 1982. In the consequence of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, past government told the nation that the power of its armed forces alone could not "bring enduring settlement" and acknowledged "legitimate rights of the Palestinian population."
Yet a US-led regional peace plan intended to resolve those concerns went nowhere. Overseas, Palestinian leadership observed helplessly.
Global attention in the Middle East waned. Israel opposed compromises. Afterward, there was the first intifada, and the establishment of further armed organizations.
- The patterns of history offer sobering perspectives for contemporary resolution attempts
- Lasting solutions require confronting root causes rather than short-term truces
- Area politics continue to evolve in multifaceted and often unpredictable ways